Ableism is not just about hatred – sometimes it’s about desire.»
– Andrew Gurza, disability activist
The Hidden Danger Behind «Desire»
Lately, there’s been growing discussions about a deeply uncomfortable trend: the fetishization of disabled people – especially young disabled people. Whether it be on social media, dating apps, and even in online communities.
Don’t get me wrong, disabled people have desires, wants and the potential for sexual attraction as much as anyone else – but what we are talking about here is not just about missplaced attraction. It’s about objectifying disability, and reducing a person’s identity and humanity to a single factor: their body, difference – their «otherness» alone.
«To be seen only for what makes you different… is to not be seen at all.»
– Silje Elsrud Yttervik
Le Monde recently published a piece, where several young disabled people shared how they recieved hypersexualized messages that focused explicitly on their disability. This could be all from prostetics, scars, to moving with crutches or in a wheelchair (LeMonde.fr).
These experiences, unfortionately aren’t rare – they’re part of a sinister pattern rooted in ableism, where disability is not fully acknowledged as part of a person, but fetishized as a spectacle or as a kink.
Why it’s So Harmful
Fetishization does more than ignore people’s boundaries. it often:
- Reduces a person to their physical or visible «difference» rather than seeing them as a complex, full human.
- Risks emotional and sexual exploitation, because their fetishizer may prioritize their own fantasy over the disabled person’s agency or comfort.
- Reinforces a broader culture of dehumanization – where disability isn’t just misunderstood, but also eroticized in a way that strips away a person’s dignity.
Furthermore, research also backs this up. A study on disability pornography (PubMed) points out how certain forms of sexual content celebrate «vulnerability» and impaired agency in women with disabilities – often linking it to power and dominance. And this is not about intimacy – it’s about control disguised as desire.
Back in Time:
When Disabled Bodies Were Spectacle Before They Were People
To truly understand why fetishization cuts so deeply for many disabled people today, we have to look backwards – to a time when disabled bodies were not just stared at, but also sold as curiosities, entertainment or ‘marvels‘.
Throughout the 18th and the 19th centuries, what we now call a part of the disabled community was often introduced to the wider world through circus-sideshows, ‘freakshows’, travelling exhibitions, and wider cabinets of ‘curiositites’. And they were introduced as ‘marvels’, ‘oddities’, ‘wonders’ and ‘specimens’, just barely considered as people!
Many were born with congenial conditions, chronic illnesses, or unusual physical traits and differences – that medical science simply didn’t yet understand.
Some became famous in ways they never fully controlled: like ‘hairy women‘ with hypertrichosis, conjoined twins, people unusually large or small in stature, those with growth disorders, or skeletal/ visible deformities…
Thus, instead of recieving care or respect, they became objects of horror and fascination.
And this fascination includes fetishization.
Many had their bodies marketed as exotic, erotic, or monstrous – often all at once. Posters drew- and described them in sensual or titillating language, framing their differences as something to-be-staired-at, consumed or desired in a way that simply erased their personhood.
Because, what was fetishized was never their humanity – only their difference.
And this history is not as distant as we’d like to believe!
For centuries, disabled people were only allowed visibility in two forms; through pity or through fetish.
Neither left room for dignity, autonomy, or complexity.
So when disabled people today speak about the pain of fetishization, it is not only about the present moment. It is about the heavy, inherited memory of being displayed rather than understood. Of being commodified rather than cared for. And of being reduced to a spectacle – first in a tent – now, too often on TikTok and the likes.
It’s almost like the world has changed, yet the structures around us have not.
TheNorwegian/ Youth Perspective
In Norway, this issue intersects with serious gaps in conversation about sexuality, youth and disability. According to Unge Funksjonshemmede – a national organization for young people with disabilities, there is a notable presence of «sexualiserte hatytringer» (sexualized hatespeech) on social media (Regjeringen.no).
Their reports highlights how disabled youth experience negative attention that is explicitly tied to their disability: through objectification, pressure and even harassment.
In their campaign Sex som Funker, they further explore how difficult it is to address sexual desire, consent and safety when people treat disabled bodies as inherently different, or as a source of fantasy (Unge Funksjonshemmede).
My Own Reflection: Why This Hit’s Close to Home
I’ve personally thought alot about how visibility works, both in general – and while working on my MA thesis: Modern Marvels: The Heritage of Exhibited Disability.
And, for most of us (disabled or not) – visibility is about being seen and wanted, but not about being sexualized.
Because, when people fetishize disability, they don’t necessary see the person in question; they see a fragment of them – like a fantasy living rent free in their brain.
And it hurts too, to realize how many conversations around disability and attraction that is still rooted in power – not mutual desire, but domination or infantlization. And that makes me pause: for how can we talk about sex safely, when the opposite of invisibility can feel so dangerous?
Reclaiming Our Sexuality
But there is hope. And there is power within us.
Many disabled activists, have long fought to reclaim both narrative, desire and agency. People like Andrew Gurza, who started the hashtag #DisabledPeopleAreHot – not as a fetish, but as a declaration: Yes, our bodies are valid, whole and worthy of desire. Organizations like Sins Invalid push even further: by celebrating erotic, empowered, and disabled bodies – challenging ideas of beauty and sexuality in itself.
We can demand more visibility, and we can demand more respect.
Through consent, and humanizing desire.
—
A Task For Reflection
This week, I invite you to reflect (and maybe share):
- Have you ever recieved unwanted sexual attention because of your disability? (Or been objectified in any way)?
– or have you maybe ever fetishized someone else’s disability? - How did it make you feel – seen? used? unsafe? powerful? mixed?
- If you could speak to the people who fetishize disability, what would you want them to understand about you – not just your body/ mind, but you?
– Silje

